From derby-dev-return-94651-apmail-db-derby-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org Wed Apr 4 06:43:15 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7C2F97DF for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 06:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67301 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2012 06:43:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 66518 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2012 06:43:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 66340 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2012 06:42:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 06:42:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nufail56@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.172] (HELO mail-wi0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 06:42:48 +0000 Received: by wibhj6 with SMTP id hj6so169892wib.13 for ; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:42:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=XH3yVL6ii4eejgC6+2zxAKfatomJ9RHUS0w44R5iViw=; b=jl/nA4SbezH8WR8ZZyHRUeFDj6n1pWumKgDXWvT0hmdqYdg6GsnlwIce6HaX3NtN+/ DxUNbyLn5n9CCCKgTYRzSWzvCaWi0Sb8AfhF2BKMPsphDgF5TpER/WDXd4/qeqIdku0/ X4G3QLX6guRuFSv7hSjhj3htPv7udQVfGsLUyYWKE/6NtUPOEwP/XmGZdxJlJLYbwaBq PP5BVMBfvjre0mGNtYPCopJKNmKIvZcwYvtL8CjVB/xm1W4cB8LNaZ5H9TLkRD236Ka2 vML5CzYaXmA46+9mpYbLpumRSkWtYRCPh8EYgfJ3yntnna6b0gl/QIjABgLRlVExap0C Z0MA== Received: by 10.180.97.41 with SMTP id dx9mr2346340wib.9.1333521747803; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:42:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.106.198 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 23:42:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Mohamed Nufail Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 12:12:07 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GSoC 2012 - To potential student applicants on the list To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0443067413ffb504bcd4baa2 --f46d0443067413ffb504bcd4baa2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Tiago, After reading the details provided, I went through the wiki page on Derby testing [1]. And also looked at the provided code coverage report. I thought it's better to look into the existing tests for classes with poor coverage in order to get a better understanding. But I found it difficult to locate the tests written for each class. Is there an easier way to do this? Also I'd like to know how improving code coverage should be done. Are we required to write unit tests for methods that are not covered or come up with tests for the functionality of the whole class? Regards, Nufail. [1] http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTesting On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Tiago Espinha wrote: > Dear students, > > For those interested, I will be mentoring a GSoC project for Apache Derby. > > More details on: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5674 > > Regards, > Tiago > -- Mohamed Nufail Undergraduate, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Moratuwa. Blog: http://www.nufailm.blogspot.com/ --f46d0443067413ffb504bcd4baa2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tiago,

After reading the details provided, I went through the wik= i page on Derby testing [1]. And also looked at the provided code coverage = report. I thought it's better to look into the existing tests for class= es with poor coverage in order to get a better understanding. But I found i= t difficult to locate the tests written for each class. Is there an easier = way to do this?

Also I'd like to know how improving code coverage should be done. = Are we required to write unit tests for methods that are not covered or com= e up with tests for the functionality of the whole class?

Regards, Nufail.

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTesting


On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Tiago Espinha <tiago@espinha.net> wrote:
Dear students,

For those = interested, I will be mentoring a GSoC project for Apache Derby.


Regards,
Tiago



--
=09 =09 =09 =09

=09 =09 =09 =09

Mohamed Nufail=
Undergraduate,
Department of Computer Science & Engineering,
= University of Moratuwa.
Blog: http:/= /www.nufailm.blogspot.com/


--f46d0443067413ffb504bcd4baa2--