db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bryan Pendleton <bpendleton.de...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Code coverage -- sane vs insane builds
Date Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:09:11 GMT
> Hmm, if there's code covered by insane builds which is not covered by sane builds, is
that really a problem? We would just have
> to make sure that regressions are ran against insane jars and all would be well. Or am
I missing something?

I think one issue is that we may find that a substantial amount of the "missing"
code coverage is due to extra sanity checking code that is only exercised in
the sane builds.

So in fact that code *is* covered by our test suite; we just couldn't tell because
we weren't running Emma in the sane configuration.



View raw message