db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mamta Satoor <msat...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Backport analysis
Date Wed, 07 Mar 2012 03:43:52 GMT
Kathey, when I run the 10.5 query, it says no matching issues found.

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Katherine Marsden
<kmarsdenderby@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On 3/5/2012 11:50 AM, Katherine Marsden wrote:
>> I want to ask for the community help to review these two lists. For the
>> issues you fixed, if a fix does not seem appropriate for backport, Please
>> label it with the label(s) derby_backport_reject_10_8 and/or
>> derby_backport_reject_10_5  as appropriate.
> FYI  If you haven't already done this, to look at just your own  issues
> while  you are logged into Jira you can use the links below. Once you label
> them derby_backport_reject_xx_xx then they automatically come of the list.
> Rick took the approach of putting a comment in the ones that looked good for
> backport and to which I think is good so we know they've been looked at.
> 10.8 candidates for assignee = currentUser()
> original assignees  Dag and Bryan
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DERBY+and+type+%3D+Bug+and++labels+not+in+%28derby_backport_reject_10_8%29+and+resolution+%3D+fixed+and+fixVersion+in+%28%2210.9.0.0%22%29+and+fixVersion+not+in+%28%2210.8.1.2%22%2C+%2210.8.2.2%22%2C%2210.8.2.3%22%29+and+assignee+%3D+currentUser%28%29
> additional 10.5 candidates for assignee = currentUser()
> original assignees Dag, Mamta, Siddarth, Kristian, Houx, Mike, Knut Anders,
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DERBY+and+type+%3D+Bug+and++labels+not+in+%28derby_backport_reject_10_8%2Cderby_backport_reject_10_7%2C+derby_backport_reject_10_6%2C+derby_backport_reject_10_5%29+and+resolution+%3D+fixed+and+fixVersion+in+%28%2210.8.1.2%22%2C+%2210.8.2.2%22%2C%2210.8.2.3%22%29+and+fixVersion+not+in+%28%2210.5.1.1%22%2C%2210.5.2.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.1%22%2C+%2210.5.3.2%22%29+and+affectedVersion+in+%28%2210.5.1.1%22%2C%2210.5.2.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.1%22%2C+%2210.5.3.2%22%29+and+assignee+%3D+currentUser%28%29
>> Then based on everyone's input I will open up a backporting issue with the
>> issues linked on Thursday.
>> Please also let me know if there are issues that maybe missed these
>> queries for some reason such as affects version not including 10.5.  I
>> reviewed the ones that were fixed in 10.8 but not marked as regressions, but
>> it is entirely possible I missed some.

View raw message