db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Katherine Marsden <kmarsdende...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject Re: Backport analysis
Date Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:24:31 GMT
On 3/5/2012 11:50 AM, Katherine Marsden wrote:
>
> I want to ask for the community help to review these two lists. For 
> the issues you fixed, if a fix does not seem appropriate for backport, 
> Please label it with the label(s) derby_backport_reject_10_8 and/or 
> derby_backport_reject_10_5  as appropriate. 

FYI  If you haven't already done this, to look at just your own  issues 
while  you are logged into Jira you can use the links below. Once you 
label them derby_backport_reject_xx_xx then they automatically come of 
the list.   Rick took the approach of putting a comment in the ones that 
looked good for backport and to which I think is good so we know they've 
been looked at.

10.8 candidates for assignee = currentUser()
original assignees  Dag and Bryan
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DERBY+and+type+%3D+Bug+and++labels+not+in+%28derby_backport_reject_10_8%29+and+resolution+%3D+fixed+and+fixVersion+in+%28%2210.9.0.0%22%29+and+fixVersion+not+in+%28%2210.8.1.2%22%2C+%2210.8.2.2%22%2C%2210.8.2.3%22%29+and+assignee+%3D+currentUser%28%29


additional 10.5 candidates for assignee = currentUser()
original assignees Dag, Mamta, Siddarth, Kristian, Houx, Mike, Knut Anders,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+DERBY+and+type+%3D+Bug+and++labels+not+in+%28derby_backport_reject_10_8%2Cderby_backport_reject_10_7%2C+derby_backport_reject_10_6%2C+derby_backport_reject_10_5%29+and+resolution+%3D+fixed+and+fixVersion+in+%28%2210.8.1.2%22%2C+%2210.8.2.2%22%2C%2210.8.2.3%22%29+and+fixVersion+not+in+%28%2210.5.1.1%22%2C%2210.5.2.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.1%22%2C+%2210.5.3.2%22%29+and+affectedVersion+in+%28%2210.5.1.1%22%2C%2210.5.2.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.0%22%2C+%2210.5.3.1%22%2C+%2210.5.3.2%22%29+and+assignee+%3D+currentUser%28%29


> Then based on everyone's input I will open up a backporting issue with 
> the issues linked on Thursday.
>
> Please also let me know if there are issues that maybe missed these 
> queries for some reason such as affects version not including 10.5.  I 
> reviewed the ones that were fixed in 10.8 but not marked as 
> regressions, but it is entirely possible I missed some.
>


Mime
View raw message