db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kristian Waagan <kristian.waa...@oracle.com>
Subject Re: missing link for emma reports.
Date Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:02:02 GMT
On 22.02.2012 18:28, Mike Matrigali wrote:
> Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
>> Knut Anders Hatlen <knut.hatlen@oracle.com> writes:
>>
>>> dag.wanvik@oracle.com (Dag H. Wanvik) writes:
>>>
>>>> Mike Matrigali <mikem_app@sbcglobal.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> I am hoping to get to a detail where I could identify untested
>>>>> routines/lines.  I think it might be at the following "all classes"
>>>>> link from above page but get an error trying to use that link.  I 
>>>>> have
>>>>> not looked at this for a long time, so not sure if it has ever worked
>>>>> publicly or not.:
>>>>> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/coverage/coverage/sol/suitesAll20100402/index.html

>>>>>
>>>> Not sure what's happening here. When I run emma in my sandbox I can
>>>> indeed use these links. I believe Knut set this up on the test
>>>> machines, I'm sure he can figure out what's missing tomorrow.
>>> The date in the URL indicates it's a two year old test run, so it
>>> probably doesn't tell much about the present state of the trunk in any
>>> case. :)
>>>
>>> I have set up a nightly test coverage run, but it's not published
>>> anywhere right now. For some reason, the report generation frequently
>>> fails with:
>>>
>>> java.io.UTFDataFormatException: malformed input around byte 52
>>>     at java.io.DataInputStream.readUTF(DataInputStream.java:656)
>>>     at java.io.DataInputStream.readUTF(DataInputStream.java:564)
>>>     at 
>>> com.vladium.emma.data.ClassDescriptor.readExternal(ClassDescriptor.java:171)
>>>     at com.vladium.emma.data.MetaData.readExternal(MetaData.java:228)
>>>     at 
>>> com.vladium.emma.data.DataFactory.readEntry(DataFactory.java:770)
>>>     at 
>>> com.vladium.emma.data.DataFactory.mergeload(DataFactory.java:461)
>>>     at com.vladium.emma.data.DataFactory.load(DataFactory.java:56)
>>>     at 
>>> com.vladium.emma.report.ReportProcessor._run(ReportProcessor.java:175)
>>>     at com.vladium.emma.Processor.run(Processor.java:54)
>>>     at 
>>> com.vladium.emma.report.reportCommand.run(reportCommand.java:130)
>>>     at emma.main(emma.java:40)
>>>
>>> I'll see if I can publish the reports in the cases where they are
>>> generated successfully.
>>
>> An updated report is available here:
>> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/coverage/
>>
> thanks.  That is a great upper level report.  Is there any generated 
> report/data that would allow me to tell which classes, methods, 
> blocks, lines are not covered?  Obviously lines would be a huge amount 
> of data.  I think classes and methods would be a great start at 
> pointing us at what new testing we should do.

You can drill down by clicking the package/class name. Am I 
misunderstanding your question?

For instance, at package level: 
http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/coverage/_files/1a.html
And at the class level: 
http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/coverage/_files/d2.html


-- 
Kristian

Mime
View raw message