Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9157B1D7 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33846 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 15:12:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 33767 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 15:12:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 33759 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2012 15:12:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:12:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of m.v.lunteren@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.44] (HELO mail-pz0-f44.google.com) (209.85.210.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:12:17 +0000 Received: by dajz8 with SMTP id z8so3964413daj.31 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:11:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zNwRWig61EVfyqaIvO8JCBjLE/HsFDdJpQ9j0vKwUmc=; b=ht1kEM1ZW1khw8qqQTz3ynwbFOoxrZldfHYwoqYnSHOwF7TJzM4Hp1PxLKPEpUtgKR ecUl6muXRk6V7QfQ5T/xNZTXO5Lyyp87DE+6yKUoQHVERvfzz2IoQpwfrMP+ilPogbLw f0O015P+9TqEOPpRfW20UpfNtQhW3G9POheh4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.115.106 with SMTP id jn10mr8641189pbb.64.1326208316720; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:11:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.40.1 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:11:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F0C4150.5030000@oracle.com> References: <4F061942.2060504@oracle.com> <4F06F823.2040905@oracle.com> <4F072DEC.8060402@fastmail.fm> <4F0730D8.5080007@fastmail.fm> <4F0749E6.5010407@oracle.com> <8739brqjsx.fsf@oracle.com> <4F08E76C.9000704@fastmail.fm> <4F0C4150.5030000@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:11:56 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Copyright clairification for fo2html.xsl in Derby software. From: Myrna van Lunteren To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Rick Hillegas w= rote: > On 1/9/12 4:36 PM, Myrna van Lunteren wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Andrew McIntyre >> =A0wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Jean T. Anderson >>> =A0wrote: >>>> >>>> I did some checking and that file has been in the subversion resposito= ry >>>> since April 2005, added in revision 161353 with the log message "Add >>>> single >>>> page HTML output to derby doc build." -- in other words, ever since we >>>> started using DITA to build the docs, so I expect it to be in all >>>> distributions starting with 10.1. I'll check with Andrew next week to >>>> see if >>>> he remembers more of the story around this file. Or maybe one of the >>>> other >>>> committers on this list who have tweaked this file can comment? >>>> >>>> In the meantime, while we untangle the story to all our satisfaction, >>>> anyone >>>> who further distributes the derby product should, of course, follow th= e >>>> advice of their lawyer. If there's any concern about this file, then o= ne >>>> option would be to omit the single book HTML file from your distributi= on >>>> -- >>>> perhaps just include the PDF file or link to the single book HTML file >>>> on >>>> the apache site. >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> >>>> =A0-jean >>> >>> Hi Jean, >>> >>> We had been using this file to generate single-page HTML documentation >>> for test and review during the DITA conversion since before the docs >>> were contributed to Apache. I checked it in when I was moving the doc >>> build machinery into Subversion. In retrospect, I probably shouldn't >>> have checked it in, but when someone went to modify it is when we had >>> the original discussion. There should at least be an entry for it in >>> the doc-src NOTICES. I can remove the file if it's a problem though, >>> as the file could be downloaded directly to the release builder's >>> machine by Ant. Also, there are other, free options for converting >>> PDFs to HTML files. >>> >>> - andrew >> >> I think we should probably get rid of this file, and we should really >> avoid using it altogether. Is there anyone who has the skill to >> replace this file? >> >> Myrna >> > I ran a quick experiment: I removed fo2html.xsl and verified that I could > build the frames html docs. Here are some solutions listed in declining > order of effort: > > 1) Remove fo2html.xsl. > > + Easy. > - We will lose the no-frames version of the html docs. I do use the > no-frames version when citing doc passages in posts to derby-user. That i= s > my only use for the no-frames version. Passage citations would be a littl= e > more cumbersome, but I could live with that. > > 2) Track down Nikolai Grigoriev and get him to open source this file unde= r > Apache 2.0. > > + Preserves the no-frames version of the docs. > + Relatively low effort on our part. > - Unbounded problem. We're not certain that we can track him down or that= he > would agree to use the Apache 2.0 license. > > 3) Replace fo2html.xsl with an xsl transformation which we write ourselve= s. > > + Preserves the no-frames version of the docs. > - Probably outside the current skill sets of our current contributors. > > 4) Convert the docs to another source format. > > + Would be an opportunity to address our dissatisfactions with DITA, > including its accessibility problems and our inability to generate a doc > index. > - Big effort. > > Thanks, > -Rick Quick question/comment re 2): Nikolai Grigoriev is listed as author but isn't the copyright by renderX? Daniel Dobbins said he tried to contact the author without result, perhaps he didn't try the company...But - I am not a lawyer. I prefer option 4 but have no time/skill, so for short term 1. Myrna