db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dag H. Wanvik (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-5591) Imprecise wording in documentation in ref man on DROP VIEW
Date Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:40:10 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13196180#comment-13196180
] 

Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-5591:
--------------------------------------

Btw, the view will get dropped if privileges to objects it depends on are revoked, too, cf
REVOKE statement doc, http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.8/ref/rrefsqljrevoke.html.
Of course, REVOKE isn't strictly "dropping", but DROP ROLE will lead to privilege revocation,
so DROP ROLE is another example negating the sentence in question.

                
> Imprecise wording in documentation in ref man on DROP VIEW
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-5591
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5591
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation
>            Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
>            Priority: Minor
>
> This sentence is misleading: "Any statements referencing the view are invalidated on
a DROP VIEW statement. DROP VIEW is disallowed if there are any views or open cursors dependent
on the view. The view must be dropped before any objects that it is dependent on can be dropped."

> This isn't quite true. If a column is dropped with the CASCADE option, any dependent
view(s) will be dropped. Are there other cases?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message