Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A125B7B18 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 19:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83148 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2011 19:41:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 83129 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2011 19:41:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 83122 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2011 19:41:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:41:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2001.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:41:00 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFBD10A069 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 19:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 19:40:40 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rick Hillegas (Commented) (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Message-ID: <1095499411.59724.1323459640132.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-866) Derby User Management Enhancements MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166484#comment-13166484 ] Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-866: ------------------------------------- Hi Mike, Thanks for thinking about this proposal. I would like to begin addressing your comments. NATIVE authentication introduces two new conglomerates, the SYSUSERS heap and a primary key index on its USERNAME column. On my system, taking default page sizes, those empty conglomerates take up 16K space on disk. I believe that is noise compared to the 1.8M consumed by the entire empty Derby database. I don't see much value in optimizing out that noise. However, some day we may want to seriously slim down the size of our empty database. If we want to do that, then I could see value in building a mechanism which creates certain catalogs only if they are actually needed. The following catalogs would be targets for this mechanism. All of these catalogs start out empty and will never have any tuples unless the application uses the indicated features: SQL Authorization catalogs: sys.syscolperms sys.sysperms sys.sysroles sys.systableperms SQL Routines: sys.sysfiles Sequences: sys.syssequences NATIVE authentication: sys.sysusers Views: sys.sysviews Thanks, -Rick > Derby User Management Enhancements > ---------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-866 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-866 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Services > Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6 > Reporter: Francois Orsini > Assignee: Rick Hillegas > Attachments: Derby_User_Enhancement.html, Derby_User_Enhancement_v1.1.html, DummyAuthenticator.java, UserManagement.html, UserManagement.html, UserManagement.html, derby-866-01-aa-sysusers.diff, derby-866-01-ab-sysusers.diff, dummyCredentials.properties > > > Proposal to enhance Derby's Built-In DDL User Management. (See proposal spec attached to the JIRA). > Abstract: > This feature aims at improving the way BUILT-IN users are managed in Derby by providing a more intuitive and familiar DDL interface. Currently (in 10.1.2.1), Built-In users can be defined at the system and/or database level. Users created at the system level can be defined via JVM or/and Derby system properties in the derby.properties file. Built-in users created at the database level are defined via a call to a Derby system procedure (SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_SET_DATABASE_PROPERTY) which sets a database property. > Defining a user at the system level is very convenient and practical during the development phase (EOD) of an application - However, the user's password is not encrypted and consequently appears in clear in the derby.properties file. Hence, for an application going into production, whether it is embedded or not, it is preferable to create users at the database level where the password is encrypted. > There is no real ANSI SQL standard for managing users in SQL but by providing a more intuitive and known interface, it will ease Built-In User management at the database level as well as Derby's adoption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira