Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7EA37E4C for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30807 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2011 13:28:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 30763 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2011 13:28:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 30756 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2011 13:28:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:28:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2001.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:28:01 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D77BA6F51 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:27:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rick Hillegas (Commented) (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Message-ID: <1232689013.21851.1322573261548.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-866) Derby User Management Enhancements MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159253#comment-13159253 ] Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-866: ------------------------------------- Thanks, Dag. Yes, LDAP should work. I lump it in category (III). Thanks. > Derby User Management Enhancements > ---------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-866 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-866 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Services > Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6 > Reporter: Francois Orsini > Attachments: Derby_User_Enhancement.html, Derby_User_Enhancement_v1.1.html > > > Proposal to enhance Derby's Built-In DDL User Management. (See proposal spec attached to the JIRA). > Abstract: > This feature aims at improving the way BUILT-IN users are managed in Derby by providing a more intuitive and familiar DDL interface. Currently (in 10.1.2.1), Built-In users can be defined at the system and/or database level. Users created at the system level can be defined via JVM or/and Derby system properties in the derby.properties file. Built-in users created at the database level are defined via a call to a Derby system procedure (SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_SET_DATABASE_PROPERTY) which sets a database property. > Defining a user at the system level is very convenient and practical during the development phase (EOD) of an application - However, the user's password is not encrypted and consequently appears in clear in the derby.properties file. Hence, for an application going into production, whether it is embedded or not, it is preferable to create users at the database level where the password is encrypted. > There is no real ANSI SQL standard for managing users in SQL but by providing a more intuitive and known interface, it will ease Built-In User management at the database level as well as Derby's adoption. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira