db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Knut Anders Hatlen <knut.hat...@oracle.com>
Subject Re: Largedata test history
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:44:18 GMT
Kathey Marsden <kmarsdenderby@sbcglobal.net> writes:

> Myrna noticed that the IBM largeData test results were truncated,
> probably because they did not finish and were interrupted by the next
> day's run.  I don't have test history, so am not sure if these tests
> have become slower or just actually never finished.
>
> I noticed the last posted results for the Sun JVM were for revision
> 835496 which was in the 10.6 timeframe.
> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/trunk15/largedata/testing/Limited/testSummary-current.html
>
> At that time, the duration was 242.62% of revision 433306 which was in
> the 10.3 timeframe.
>
> I was wondering
> 1) Does anyone remember if we understood the duration difference with
> revision 835496?
> 2)  Is there a more comprehensive history available?
> 3) Are there more recent statistics?

I cannot find any newer results than revision 835496. Looking at
whatever is left of logs from these runs I see this:

,----
| Built on SunOS 5.10 i386 i86pc[siv02.norway.sun.com] at 2006-08-21 19:47:02
| 
| Suite   Tests   Passed  Failed  Skippd  Duration
| largeData       4       4       0       0       04:27:07
| 
| Started:        2006-08-21 23:30:04     End:    2006-08-22 03:57:15     Host:   siv39.norway.sun.com
`----

and

,----
| Built on SunOS 5.10 i386 i86pc[siv02.norway.sun.com] at 2009-11-12 19:47:04
| 
| Suite   Tests   Passed  Failed  Skippd  Duration
| largeData       1       1       0       0       10:48:06
| 
| Started:        2009-11-13 02:00:04     End:    2009-11-13 12:48:17     Host:   nanna18.norway.sun.com
`----

So it looks like the 433306 run was on a different machine than the
835496 run, which might explain the difference in duration. I have never
run this test suite myself, so I don't know what it means that one of
them reports four tests passed and the other one just one test.

-- 
Knut Anders

Mime
View raw message