db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kathey Marsden <kmarsdende...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject Re: Sunsetting support for Derby on JVM 1.4
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:24:32 GMT
On 7/1/2011 1:23 AM, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
> Mike Matrigali<mikem_app@sbcglobal.net>  writes:
>
>> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>> No-one on the user list has objected to sunsetting support for JVM
>>> 1.4 starting with Derby 10.9. There is still some interest in
>>> supporting small devices on CDC/FP 1.1. Sunsetting support for JVM
>>> 1.4 would mean that we would stop running regression tests on that
>>> platform (starting with Derby 10.9) and we would not spend a lot of
>>> effort chasing problems on that platform.
>>>
>>> Because we would continue supporting CDC/FP 1.1, we would not be
>>> able to modernize the bulk of Derby code to take advantage of
>>> language features introduced by Java 5. These features include
>>> enums, annotations, and generics.
>>>
>>> I would like to move ahead with sunsetting support for JVM 1.4. I'm
>>> happy to call a formal vote to ratify this change if people think
>>> that would be useful. What are your thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Rick
>>>
>> I am not sure what it means in open source for such a vote.  If anyone
>> wants to run tests and fix issues for JVM 1.4 or any other JVM that
>> seems fine to me.  Individual contributors as always can decide which
>> features and bugs to work on.  It would be different if we were
>> deciding to actively check
>> in things to the default Derby set of features that we know would not
>> work against JVM 1.4 architecture.
>>
>> As I understand it nothing is changing.
>> The default set of Derby 10.9 is designed to work
>> against the JDK 1.4 spec, and allows extensions against more recent
>> specs for features designed to be "optional and/or enhanced".
> I was hoping that if we agreed on not supporting Java 1.4 anymore, it
> would allow us to start using Java 5 features in those areas of the code
> that aren't used on Java ME. In particular, I was hoping that it opened
> for the following improvements:
>
> - Using Java 5 features in the client driver and the network server.
>
I am glad you mentioned this, because I hadn't really thought of it this 
way.  Does this mean that we are ruling out client on small devices in 
the future?  I am not sure that I (or anyone I know)  has time to do 
this but it seems like it would be useful.




Mime
View raw message