db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kathey Marsden (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-4249) Create a simple store recovery test in JUnit
Date Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:55:57 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13067001#comment-13067001
] 

Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-4249:
---------------------------------------

Hi Siddharth,

I did not apply but looked briefly at why the process might not execute.
           String[] cmd= new String[]{"java junit.textui.TestRunner -m org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.store.RecoveryTest.launchRecoveryInsert"};

The individual arguments should be broken out into separate String array elements and also
java should not be included in what is passed to execJavaCmd as the java executable is determined
by execJavaCmd.  I'd suggest you make that change and then run the test with -Dderby.tests.debug=true
and then execJavaCmd will show exactly what it is trying to execute. You can then cut and
paste that into a shell to see what might be going wrong.  You can also use BaseTestCase.readProcessOutput
to read the output and see what error is being encountered.  This method will probably be
useful as well to get the output if the  process fails.


As an aside, ultimately you will want to pass the class and fixture into  assertLaunchedJUnitFixture()
so it can be used generically.



> Create a simple store recovery test in JUnit
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4249
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4249
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Test
>    Affects Versions: 10.6.1.0
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Assignee: Siddharth Srivastava
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: d4249.diff, d4249_1.diff
>
>
> It would be good to be able to start converting the store  recovery tests  or at least
be able to write new recovery tests in JUnit.   We could start by writing a simple recovery
test just to establish the framework.  The test should.
> -  Connect, create a table, commit and shutdown the database.
> -  fork a jvm, add one row, commit, add another row, exit  the jvm.
> -  Reconnect with the first jvm and verify that the first row is there and the second
is not.
> I guess the main thing to decide is how to spawn the second jvm and check results.  
 I tend to think the second jvm should actually execute another JUnit test, verify the exit
code (assuming a failed test has a non-zero exit code) and then put the output in the fail
assertion if it fails so it shows up in the report at the end of the Suite execution.   I
think we could create a test runner that takes a class and a specific test to run instead
of the whole suite, so we could keep our methods consolidated in a single class for the test,
but all pure conjecture at this point.  I'll have to give it a try, but wanted to first see
if folks thought this was a reasonable approach.
>  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message