db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-4249) Create a simple store recovery test in JUnit
Date Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:11:59 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13063351#comment-13063351
] 

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-4249:
-------------------------------------------

I think junit.textui.TestRunner can do the same with the -m option:

java junit.textui.TestRunner -m <classname>.<methodname>

> Create a simple store recovery test in JUnit
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4249
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4249
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Test
>    Affects Versions: 10.6.1.0
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Assignee: Siddharth Srivastava
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: d4249.diff
>
>
> It would be good to be able to start converting the store  recovery tests  or at least
be able to write new recovery tests in JUnit.   We could start by writing a simple recovery
test just to establish the framework.  The test should.
> -  Connect, create a table, commit and shutdown the database.
> -  fork a jvm, add one row, commit, add another row, exit  the jvm.
> -  Reconnect with the first jvm and verify that the first row is there and the second
is not.
> I guess the main thing to decide is how to spawn the second jvm and check results.  
 I tend to think the second jvm should actually execute another JUnit test, verify the exit
code (assuming a failed test has a non-zero exit code) and then put the output in the fail
assertion if it fails so it shows up in the report at the end of the Suite execution.   I
think we could create a test runner that takes a class and a specific test to run instead
of the whole suite, so we could keep our methods consolidated in a single class for the test,
but all pure conjecture at this point.  I'll have to give it a try, but wanted to first see
if folks thought this was a reasonable approach.
>  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message