Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60B276184 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33678 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 15:04:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 33660 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2011 15:04:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 33651 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2011 15:04:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:04:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL,TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.110.150] (HELO e32.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:04:31 +0000 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p5UEqEGn031786 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:52:14 -0600 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (d03av06.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.245]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id p5UF3nlK150398 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:03:50 -0600 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p5UF9Cr1026463 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:09:12 -0600 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-113-139.mts.ibm.com [9.48.113.139]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id p5UF96uS026111 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 09:09:10 -0600 Message-ID: <4E0C904D.2080906@sbcglobal.net> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:03:41 -0700 From: Kathey Marsden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Largedata test history Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Myrna noticed that the IBM largeData test results were truncated, probably because they did not finish and were interrupted by the next day's run. I don't have test history, so am not sure if these tests have become slower or just actually never finished. I noticed the last posted results for the Sun JVM were for revision 835496 which was in the 10.6 timeframe. http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/trunk15/largedata/testing/Limited/testSummary-current.html At that time, the duration was 242.62% of revision 433306 which was in the 10.3 timeframe. I was wondering 1) Does anyone remember if we understood the duration difference with revision 835496? 2) Is there a more comprehensive history available? 3) Are there more recent statistics? Thanks Kathey