Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:19:28 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Message-ID: 
 <1993805431.1805.1309339168385.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: 
 <918958510.11016.1308233267687.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (DERBY-5282) Convert store/RowLockBasic.sql to
 junit
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057111#comment-13057111 ] 

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-5282:
-------------------------------------------

The SET ISOLATION statement follows the DB2 naming of the isolation levels, which doesn't match the names used in SQL and JDBC. And just to make things extra confusing, they both have an isolation level called "repeatable read", but not the same one, so "set isolation to RR" actually sets the isolation level to Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE. The mapping between DB2 isolation levels and JDBC isolation levels can be found here: http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/devguide/cdevconcepts15366.html

> Convert store/RowLockBasic.sql to junit
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-5282
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5282
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Test
>            Reporter: Houx Zhang
>            Assignee: Houx Zhang
>              Labels: gsoc2011
>         Attachments: derby-5282-1.patch, derby-5282-1.state
>
>


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira