Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 26518 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 19:42:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 19:42:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 1314 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 19:42:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 1291 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2011 19:42:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 1279 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2011 19:42:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:42:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.116] (HELO hel.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.116) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:42:50 +0000 Received: from hel.zones.apache.org (hel.zones.apache.org [140.211.11.116]) by hel.zones.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811D83AB618 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:42:29 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lily Wei (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Message-ID: <646989903.4647.1300218149525.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <400735010.3927.1300204889936.JavaMail.tomcat@hel.zones.apache.org> Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-5134) CallableStatement.getObjet(string,class) returns JDBC method is not yet implemented exception MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007124#comment-13007124 ] Lily Wei commented on DERBY-5134: --------------------------------- Thanks Rick and Knut. How many other calls that require implementing named parameters? Will it be for JDBC 4.1 or other JDBC version? From user perspective, getObject(String,Class) is more visible than named parameters. I agree once we have parameter name to parameter index, it should be pretty straight forward to implement all of the getXXX(String) methods. > CallableStatement.getObjet(string,class) returns JDBC method is not yet implemented exception > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-5134 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5134 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: JDBC > Affects Versions: 10.7.1.1 > Environment: Windows 7 > Reporter: Lily Wei > Labels: derby_triage10_8 > > CallableStatement.getObjet(string,class) returns JDBC method is not yet implemented exception. > Please refer to http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/JDBCSupport for more information. > i.e. The following code is not supported: > CallableStatement.getObject( colID, candidate ); //String colID, Class candidate > (You may find the similar code in org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.jdbc4.CallableStatementTest) > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira