Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4D5BE31E.9030605@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 06:45:50 -0800
From: Rick Hillegas <rick.hillegas@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Thunderbird/3.1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kathey Marsden <kmarsdenderby@sbcglobal.net>
CC: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: 10.8 triage - we should be updating both urgency and adding label
 right?
References: <4D5AC202.10900@sbcglobal.net> <4D5AC63E.5070202@sbcglobal.net>
 <4D5AD5FD.4060507@oracle.com> <4D5AFB3D.1000304@sbcglobal.net>
In-Reply-To: <4D5AFB3D.1000304@sbcglobal.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2/15/11 2:16 PM, Kathey Marsden wrote:
> On 2/15/2011 11:37 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> One possibility might be to bulk update the ones that have Urgency 
>>> but no label to have a derby_triage_10_5_2 and then maybe I can 
>>> write a query that will check for both urgency and the 10.8 label. I 
>>> will see if I can do that.
>>>
> Ok. This is done.  Thanks everyone on the feedback.   Hopefully this 
> will all make things easier next time around since we will have the 
> queries set up and know exactly when issues were last reviewed.
>
> JDBC Bugs now shows complete on the Wiki but with 19 issues listed.  
> Rick, could you unassign yourself or bulk update as you see appropriate.
Bulk-updated to low urgency.

Regards,
-Rick
>
> Thanks
>
> Kathey
>
>