db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From dag.wan...@oracle.com (Dag H. Wanvik)
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-4741) Make embedded Derby work reliably in the presence of thread interrupts
Date Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:40:47 GMT
"Kim Haase (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org> writes:

>     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12996091#comment-12996091
> Kim Haase commented on DERBY-4741:
> ----------------------------------
> Thanks! Does "long-running" apply to all three nouns ("queries, batches and statements
that...") or just the first?

Good question. All: I guess the definition of "long" here is relative to
the applications expectations. The third one (locks) is limited upward
to the lock timeout for a single lock grab, but that may not be the
whole story since the statement may need further locks to complete. So
"longer than expected" is perhaps more to the point..


View raw message