db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dag H. Wanvik (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-4741) Make embedded Derby work reliably in the presence of thread interrupts
Date Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:13:38 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12998165#comment-12998165
] 

Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-4741:
--------------------------------------

(reposting my answer from email here, since it didnt seem to make it to the JIRA issue)

Kim> Does "long-running" apply to all three nouns ("queries, batches and statements that...")
or just the first?

Good question. All: I guess the definition of "long" here is relative to
the applications expectations. The third one (locks) is limited upward
to the lock timeout for a single lock grab, but that may not be the
whole story since the statement may need further locks to complete. So
"longer than expected" is perhaps more to the point..

> Make embedded Derby work reliably in the presence of thread interrupts
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4741
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4741
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Store
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6, 10.2.2.0, 10.3.1.4, 10.3.2.1, 10.3.3.0, 10.4.1.3, 10.4.2.0,
10.5.1.1, 10.5.2.0, 10.5.3.0, 10.6.1.0
>            Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
>            Assignee: Dag H. Wanvik
>              Labels: derby_triage10_8
>         Attachments: InterruptResilienceTest.java, MicroAPITest.java, derby-4741-a-01-api-interruptstatus.diff,
derby-4741-a-01-api-interruptstatus.stat, derby-4741-a-02-api-interruptstatus.diff, derby-4741-a-02-api-interruptstatus.stat,
derby-4741-a-03-api-interruptstatus.diff, derby-4741-a-03-api-interruptstatus.stat, derby-4741-a-04-api-interruptstatus.diff,
derby-4741-a-04-api-interruptstatus.stat, derby-4741-all+lenient+resurrect.diff, derby-4741-all+lenient+resurrect.stat,
derby-4741-b-01-nio.diff, derby-4741-b-01-nio.stat, derby-4741-b-02-nio.diff, derby-4741-b-02-nio.stat,
derby-4741-b-03-nio.diff, derby-4741-b-03-nio.stat, derby-4741-b-04-nio.diff, derby-4741-b-04-nio.stat,
derby-4741-c-01-nio.diff, derby-4741-c-01-nio.stat, derby-4741-kristians-01.diff, derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks+throws.diff,
derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks+throws.stat, derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks-2.diff,
derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks-2.stat, derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks.diff,
derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits+locks.stat, derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits.diff, derby-4741-nio-container+log+waits.stat,
derby-4741-nio-container+log.diff, derby-4741-nio-container+log.stat, derby-4741-nio-container-2.diff,
derby-4741-nio-container-2.log, derby-4741-nio-container-2.stat, derby-4741-nio-container-2b.diff,
derby-4741-nio-container-2b.stat, derby-4741-raf-stresstest-1.diff, derby-4741-raf-stresstest-1.stat,
derby-4741-raf-stresstest-2.diff, derby-4741-raf-stresstest-2.stat, derby-4741-raf-stresstest-3.diff,
derby-4741-raf-stresstest-3.stat, derby-4741-raf-stresstest-4.diff, derby-4741-raf-stresstest-4.stat,
derby-4741-sleeps-waits-1.diff, derby-4741-sleeps-waits-1.stat, derby-4741-sleeps-waits-2.diff,
derby-4741-sleeps-waits-2.stat, derby-4741-sleeps-waits-3.diff, derby-4741-sleeps-waits-3.stat,
derby-4741-sleeps-waits-more.diff, derby-4741-sleeps-waits-more.stat, derby-4741-testBatchInterrupt-b.diff,
derby-4741-testBatchInterrupt.diff, derby-4741-testQueryInterrupt.diff, derby-4741-testQueryInterrupt.stat,
derby.log, derby.log, interrupts-fs.html, interrupts-fs.html, interrupts-fs.html, interrupts-fs.html,
sleep-1-usages.txt, wait-0-usages.txt, wait-1-usages.txt, xsbt0.log.gz
>
>
> When not executing on a small device VM, Derby has been using the Java NIO classes java.nio.clannel.*
for file io for extra concurrency.
> If a thread is interrupted while executing blocking IO operations in NIO, the ClosedByInterruptException
will get thrown. Unfortunately, Derby isn't current architected to retry and complete such
operations (before passing on the interrupt), so the Derby database store can be left in an
inconsistent state, although no data is corrupted, and we therefore have to return a database
level error to perform shutdown and recovery. This means the applications can no longer access
the database while a shutdown and reboot including a recovery is taking place.
> It would be nice if Derby could somehow detect and finish IO operations underway when
thread interrupts happen before passing the exception on to the application. Derby embedded
is sometimes embedded in applications that use Thread.interrupt to stop threads.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

       

Mime
View raw message