db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-4932) Move the StringColumnVTI to the public api
Date Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:14:01 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12969966#action_12969966

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-4932:

Thanks, Rick. Does it also work if we make VTITemplateBase non-public? If so, I think we should
do that, since we probably don't want VTITemplateBase to be used directly.

> Move the StringColumnVTI to the public api
> ------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-4932
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4932
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Javadoc, SQL, Tools
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>            Assignee: Rick Hillegas
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: derby-4932-01-aa-exposeVTITemplate.diff, derby-4932-02-aa-moveStringColumnVTI.diff,
derby-4932-02-ab-moveStringColumnVTI.diff, derby-4932-03-aa-useInMemoryDBinDemos.diff, derby-4932-04-aa-retireDemoVersion.diff,
derby-4932-05-aa-addJDBC4.0versions.diff, derby-4932-05-ab-addJDBC4.0versions.diff
> I have found StringColumnVTI to be a very useful class for removing the drudgery of writing
a table function. I would like to move it to move it into the package with the other public
vti machinery and then expose it as part of Derby's public api.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message