db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <rick.hille...@oracle.com>
Subject Re: Recording published Maven 2 artifacts
Date Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:42:27 GMT
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
> Rick Hillegas <rick.hillegas@oracle.com> writes:
>
>   
>> I agree that most developers won't care about this file. It is
>> interesting archeology for release managers, though.
>>     
>
> The most interesting thing in the list is that the 10.5.3.0 artifacts
> are broken, and that 10.5.3.0_1 should be used instead. I think this is
> something that would interest our users too, which may suggest that we
> shouldn't hide this information in the source repository?
>
>   
I agree that users would be interested in knowing that 10.5.3.0_1 is the 
good distribution and 10.5.3.0 has been deprecated. Where would a 
typical maven user expect to find that information? I don't use maven 
much, so I don't think I could answer that question.

Thanks,
-Rick

Mime
View raw message