Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50182 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2010 18:49:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 19 Aug 2010 18:49:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 86536 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2010 18:49:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 86492 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2010 18:49:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 86485 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2010 18:49:51 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:49:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=FS_REPLICA,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.182.142] (HELO e2.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:49:25 +0000 Received: from d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (d01relay07.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.147]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o7JIYr6V001554 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:34:53 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o7JIn0UP2248822 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:49:00 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o7JIn0rM006649 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:49:00 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-121-239.mts.ibm.com [9.48.121.239]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o7JImvfb006512 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:48:59 -0400 Message-ID: <4C6D7C9A.6070401@sbcglobal.net> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 11:48:58 -0700 From: Kathey Marsden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: Replication and weme failures last night in IBM runs References: <4C6D5A4C.60901@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <4C6D5A4C.60901@sbcglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 8/19/2010 9:22 AM, Kathey Marsden wrote: > > > FYI > I looked at the IBM results this morning and see on ibm 1.6 all the > Replication tests failed with trace similar to the one below. > I did not do a full run after changing the DERBY-2026 tests to reset > the loginTimeout to 0, so am doing that now to > see if somehow there was an impact. IBM 1.5 was fine. The Sun > tinderbox JDK 1.6 run looks fine. The Sun nightly run did not run. > Replication tests look fine on my machine with a full run with: $ java -version java version "1.6.0" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pwi3260sr8-20100409_01(SR8)) IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, JRE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 Windows XP x86-32 jvmwi3260sr8-201004 01_55940 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled) J9VM - 20100401_055940 JIT - r9_20100401_15339 GC - 20100308_AA) JCL - 20100408_01 ..... testReplication_Encrypted_1_miniLoad_negative used 29672 ms . testReplication_Local_3_p6_autocommit_OK used 53812 ms Time: 7,735.719 OK (12822 tests) So I think something specific to the machine or intermittent must have happened last night. I can reproduce the weme problem and am looking at that now.