db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kristian Waagan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-4700) Add method to obtain a bogus port in TestConfiguration
Date Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:25:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12887358#action_12887358

Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-4700:

A comment from Dag, posted to derby-dev:
> Do we need a bogus port for an embedded TC?
Well, I used one in the BootLockTest, for example (although Kathey has
later rewritten that test to work without ports), so I wouldn't rule
it a priori. I wasn't aware that we created two concurrent TCs either,
presumably they are used in sequence, so we don't *really* need separate
port assignements for them?

> What about a JMX port?
I think JMX is useful also for an embedded Derby, so we would want to
be able to test it.


> Add method to obtain a bogus port in TestConfiguration
> ------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-4700
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4700
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Test
>    Affects Versions:
>            Reporter: Kristian Waagan
>            Assignee: Kristian Waagan
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: derby-4700-1a.diff, derby-4700-1b.diff
> In some cases one needs to obtain a port number on which there is no Derby network server.
> Today this is solved in an ad-hoc way, for instance by using the current port minus one.
When running tests in parallel, there is a chance that a port where there actually is a Derby
network server listening is picked.
> As a start, I suggest that the bogus port is allocated to the last port in the port range
configured for the run: baseport + MAX_PORTS_USED -1.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message