db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Matrigali <mikem_...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject Re: PlanExporter library requirements (DERBY-4587) (long message)
Date Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:39:00 GMT
+1

This is a much better thought out response to Derby's use of
external libraries for non core features.  I especially agree
with the following:

Bryan Pendleton wrote:

> I think we need to be cautious about how we handle external libraries
> such as Xalan or JQuery in the PlanExporter functionality. Derby needs
> to run on an extremely broad spectrum of JVM implementations, and it
> also needs to retain its low footprint, both in code size and in
> runtime resource requirements.
> 
> So I think we need to retain the basic principle that use of libraries
> such as Xalan or JQuery must be as optional external libraries that
> users can include if they wish for additional functionality, but also
> can omit with no ill effects (except perhaps the loss of some PlanExporter
> functionality). This is the way the other Derby XML-related features work.
> 



Mime
View raw message