db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kristian Waagan <kristian.waa...@oracle.com>
Subject Re: regression test regressed
Date Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:24:06 GMT
On 14.07.10 11:31, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
> On 07/14/10 10:57 AM, Tiago Espinha wrote:
>    
[ snip ]
>> I think the best and simplest way to solve this is to just bump up the limit to
>> what's required right now. Even if we require 11 or 12 ports that still allows
>> us, in theory, to have ~5000 parallel runs in the same machine, which would be
>> madness even in a top-of-the-line server.
>>
>>      
> Agreed. I don't think the issue here is that we use too many ports
> (yet). It's just that it would be good if we didn't have to maintain a
> max limit that developers may or may not discover that they need to
> increase depending on how they ran the tests. This limit also has to be
> maintained in the scripts the developers use to run the tests. So I
> think it would be nice if we could somehow make the port allocation more
> scalable, but I would be fine with just increasing the limit to, say, 20
> for now.
>    

I have committed a fix with increases the limit to 20 for now (see 
DERBY-4700).
There seems to be more issues to address when it comes to ports in the 
test framework, so we should follow up on that.


Regards,
-- 
Kristian

Mime
View raw message