Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6347 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2010 14:55:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2010 14:55:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 34344 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 14:55:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 34306 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 14:55:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 34299 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2010 14:55:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:55:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bpendleton.derby@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.172] (HELO mail-px0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:55:19 +0000 Received: by pxi16 with SMTP id 16so1439387pxi.31 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:54:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IkreFNXBdpatqn+POFyRiswTAlOwvR1L2l6QHrqRGWQ=; b=sWpIKRnGQpkMHWu+UME6enAPlOma18Tt6Y4/ZzHXcToDVjoJhziGQG91uLgZ3SfQ/y KyVkuzgXTUpSvQsgrs6WyCFNb47er44FmcwfHK2pjLmIJs90YB0SCYvsq2A0U9nHb0oZ QVBhuhwiX0jSxiuUAQBA/EZqqsuv5E4a0K9/g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FHMRXCMXjSPP48A3BaW4NFB4tYcyAXi1sipHor1QrOI6Vljfzf8tPAoXT0UbMCp8H9 LgQl/v/+RdvwMJe3FyW3jsOHS+yYUTtqeM3r7gQt5J5swZxLgge42RwHJMOzTr3KWrWd NUQ+jfDYZIEkaFmSeCB3Ip54qJPEe52NRetZs= Received: by 10.114.214.26 with SMTP id m26mr5519199wag.204.1277736895849; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:54:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.103] (c-67-170-231-73.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.170.231.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k23sm47150538waf.17.2010.06.28.07.54.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C28B7BB.3090004@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:54:51 -0700 From: Bryan Pendleton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: LockInterruptTest failing? References: <4C27C93C.2020403@gmail.com> <4C284140.1070203@Sun.COM> <4C28658C.7070408@sun.com> In-Reply-To: <4C28658C.7070408@sun.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > I'm able to reproduce with insane jars in my environment too. It looks > like there's a timing issue in the test, where the interrupted thread > may be allowed to continue before it has received the interrupt, and The test now passes in my environment, thanks for the quick responses! bryan