db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lily Wei (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (DERBY-4653) Avoid unnecessary round-trip for commit/rollback in the client driver
Date Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:19:56 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Lily Wei updated DERBY-4653:
----------------------------

    Attachment: DERBY-4653-3_withrollback.diff
                SaveRoundClientDS.java

Thanks to Kristian and Kathey.
I fix the avoid traffic for flowrollback(). We need to just flow rollback when we are in XAConnection.
The patch passed suites.allpackages and derbyall.

To test the fix:
1. Will it be okay if we just reflect the method in ..am.Connection.getTransactionID() and
make sure the next transaction is after first commit()()/rollback is a predictable number.
After the test is run, there will always be a trace file hanging around for manual inspection.
It could be cheating a little bit. However, it is a little easier than test open the trace
file and search for the number of occurrences of RDBCMM or something like that.  

> Avoid unnecessary round-trip for commit/rollback in the client driver
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4653
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4653
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: JDBC, Network Client
>    Affects Versions: 10.7.0.0
>            Reporter: Kristian Waagan
>            Assignee: Lily Wei
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: _sds_0, DERBY-4653-1.diff, DERBY-4653-2.diff, DERBY-4653-3_withrollback.diff,
SaveRoundClientDS.java, SaveRoundClientDS.java
>
>
> The methods Connection.commit() and Connection.rollback() in the client driver cause
a round-trip to the server even if the commit/rollback is unnecessary (i.e. there is nothing
to commit or roll back).
> Comments suggest (see below) that this can be optimized, such that the commands are flowed
to the server only when required. It can be seen that this optimization has been used other
places in the client driver. Never the less, it must be checked that this optimization doesn't
have side-effects.
> This issue came up in connection with connection pooling, where a pool implementation
always issued a rollback to make sure there was no active transaction on the connection handed
out.
> From Connection.flowCommit:
>         // Per JDBC specification (see javadoc for Connection.commit()):
>         //   "This method should be used only when auto-commit mode has been disabled."
>         // However, some applications do this anyway, it is harmless, so
>         // if they ask to commit, we could go ahead and flow a commit.
>         // But note that rollback() is less harmless, rollback() shouldn't be used in
auto-commit mode.
>         // This behavior is subject to further review.
>         //   if (!this.inUnitOfWork)
>         //     return;
>         // We won't try to be "too smart", if the user requests a commit, we'll flow
a commit,
>         // regardless of whether or not we're in a unit of work or in auto-commit mode.
>         //

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message