Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6716 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 02:59:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 22 May 2010 02:59:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 98870 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 02:59:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 98805 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2010 02:59:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 98798 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2010 02:59:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 02:59:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 02:59:51 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OFevy-0006cJ-Sb for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 19:59:30 -0700 Message-ID: <28640789.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 19:59:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Hawkx To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: Derby confuse with SWing Application Framework In-Reply-To: <4BF60EA2.7000408@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: hawkx@163.com References: <28629315.post@talk.nabble.com> <4BF60EA2.7000408@gmail.com> Bryan Pendleton-3 wrote: > > I'm not sure why the block occurred, but when you specified the IP > address for your server to listen on, all connection requests must be > made to that IP address. > Surprising, I did a test at home, and it is very favorable. I don't know what happened. I will make a try next monday at office. By the way, I has discarded SAF in my project. Sorry for my terrible English. Thanks for your help! -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Derby-confuse-with-SWing-Application-Framework-tp28629315p28640789.html Sent from the Apache Derby Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.