Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <19584820.8921272845035661.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 20:03:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Dag H. Wanvik (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-4179) bootLock.java fails with missing
 exception on z/OS with  pmz3160sr2ifix-20081021_01(SR2+IZ32776+IZ33456),
 and Windows Vista
In-Reply-To: <189435336.1240416587451.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863222#action_12863222 ] 

Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-4179:
--------------------------------------

Ok, the test framework starts bootLock in a subdirectory (different from the cwd when the test is started), so the forked
process (bootLock1), will have the wrong CLASSPATH: since it consists of relative paths to the jars, i.e. relative to the directory in which the test is *started*, not relative to the created subdirectory, the forked subprocess will fail, leaving the way open for bootLock to open wombat without seeing it already opened/locked. No dual boot is really happening :)

As far as I can see, this is a test bug, not a product bug, at least in the incarnation I am seeing.

> bootLock.java fails with missing exception on z/OS with  pmz3160sr2ifix-20081021_01(SR2+IZ32776+IZ33456), and Windows Vista
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4179
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4179
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Store
>    Affects Versions: 10.5.1.1
>         Environment: java version "1.6.0"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pmz3160sr2ifix-20081021_01(SR2+IZ32776+IZ33456))
> IBM J9 VM (build 2.4, J2RE 1.6.0 IBM J9 2.4 z/OS s390-31 jvmmz3160ifx-20081010_24288 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)
> J9VM - 20081009_024288_bHdSMr
> JIT  - r9_20080721_1330ifx2
> GC   - 20080724_AA)
> JCL  - 20080808_02
> ------------------------------------------
> Also seen on : Vista Ultimate 32 bits under cygwin with Sun JRE 1.6.0_07-b06
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>         Attachments: bootLock.diff, derbyall_report.txt, storeall_report.txt, sysinfo.txt
>
>
> I saw this diff in store/bootLock.java. I did not see it with the 64bit jvm run on 10.5.1.0 RC1
> *** Start: bootLock jdk1.6.0 storeall:storemore 2009-04-21 19:10:18 ***
> 2,4d1
> < expected exception
> < SQLSTATE(XJ040):
> < SQLSTATE(XSDB6):
> Test Failed.
> *** End:   bootLock jdk1.6.0 storeall:storemore 2009-04-21 19:11:00 ***
> The test passed on rerun when run independently.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.