Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90456 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 12:54:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 12:54:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 38446 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 12:54:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 38401 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 12:54:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 38394 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 12:54:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:54:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=10.0 tests=AWL,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [148.87.113.121] (HELO rcsinet10.oracle.com) (148.87.113.121) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:54:43 +0000 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com (acsinet15.oracle.com [141.146.126.227]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id o3KCsEUI019030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:54:16 GMT Received: from acsmt354.oracle.com (acsmt354.oracle.com [141.146.40.154]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id o3KCs0Ce010381 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:54:13 GMT Received: from abhmt008.oracle.com by acsmt353.oracle.com with ESMTP id 174003031271767970; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:52:50 -0700 Received: from richard-hillegas-computer.local (/129.150.247.19) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:52:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4BCDA3A0.3050405@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:52:48 -0700 From: Rick Hillegas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Re: first rev of 10.6 release notes now ready for review References: <4BCC7195.5080201@oracle.com> <4BCC8CF9.5070300@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <4BCC8CF9.5070300@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-Source-IP: acsinet15.oracle.com [141.146.126.227] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090207.4BCDA3FD.011C:SCFMA922111,ss=1,fgs=0 Thanks, Kim. This is something which the release notes generator should handle. I will look into this. Thanks, -Rick Kim Haase wrote: > I think in some cases the bugs list may include some that were > actually fixed in 10.5.3. This seems to be the case, for instance, > with DERBY-1923 and DERBY-3737, both of which specify both 10.5.2 and > 10.6 as their fix releases for some reason. Is this something I should > check and fix in my JIRAs, or can the release-notes-generating > algorithm be modified for these cases? > > Kim > > On 04/19/10 11:07 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote: >> Please review the 10.6 release notes. You can browse them here: >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/derby/code/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.html?view=co >> >> >> Please let me know how I can improve the release notes. In particular: >> >> 1) Are there missing features which we should describe in the "New >> Features" section? >> >> 2) Are there fixed bugs which don't appear in the "Bug Fixes" >> section? If so, please first try to understand why those bugs don't >> appear in the filter which I used to create this list: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12314104 >> >> >> 3) Are there bugs which need detailed release notes? If so, please >> first try to understand why those bugs don't appear in the filter >> which I used to create that list: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12314103 >> >> >> 4) Are there other problems with the release notes? >> >> I would like to compile a list of defects by 5:00 pm San Francisco >> time on Wednesday April 21. On Thursday morning I will regenerate the >> release notes for a second review. >> >> Thanks, >> -Rick >> >