Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7724 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2010 17:30:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2010 17:30:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 98840 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 17:29:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 98810 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2010 17:29:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 98802 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2010 17:29:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:29:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:29:49 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3520E234C052 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:29:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1373880632.138901268069367216.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 17:29:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lily Wei (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-4441) Change sysinfo to print out more specific JVM information In-Reply-To: <1648474455.1258065879824.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lily Wei updated DERBY-4441: ---------------------------- Attachment: DERBY-4441_diff.txt I did not do a lot of research. I am trying to get the feeling of whether this is the way we are thinking of solving this problem. >From this patch: This is what I see from sysinfo: ------------------ Java Information ------------------ Java Version: 1.6.0_13 Java Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc. Java home: C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre6 Java classpath: .;c:/derby/trunk/tools/java/junit.jar;c:/derby/trunk/jars/sane/ derbyrun.jar;c:/derby/trunk/jars/sane/derbyTesting.jar;c:/derby/trunk/tools/java /jakarta-oro-2.0.8.jar OS name: Windows Vista OS architecture: x86 OS version: 6.0 Java user name: lily Java user home: C:\Users\lily Java user dir: c:\derby\trunk java.specification.name: Java Platform API Specification java.specification.version: 1.6 java.runtime.version: 1.6.0_13-b03 java.fullversion: ... Any comment is welcome. > Change sysinfo to print out more specific JVM information > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-4441 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4441 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Tools > Affects Versions: 10.3.3.1, 10.4.2.1, 10.5.3.1, 10.6.0.0 > Reporter: Kathey Marsden > Priority: Minor > Attachments: DERBY-4441_diff.txt > > > It would be nice if sysinfo printed out more specific jvm information that is provided with java -version. At least with the IBM jvm the system properties java.runtime.version and java.fullversion give some more (but not all) information. More research is needed across multiple jvms to tie it down. Alternatively sysinfo could dump *all* the system property information, but that could make the output pretty big and show irrelavant information in some contexts. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.