Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3632 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2010 01:11:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2010 01:11:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 66134 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2010 01:11:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 66088 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2010 01:11:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 66080 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2010 01:11:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:11:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of m.v.lunteren@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.185] (HELO mail-px0-f185.google.com) (209.85.216.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:11:18 +0000 Received: by pxi15 with SMTP id 15so7795511pxi.23 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:10:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=IDW8AvPPuNtJWnb898Dqvyc6/uWtNZJCNco/AdEaQts=; b=nXbariPkMpHpe4x/6dPaXihkD8Q+tco0troNsm0Uyp1gO7FXVpgRrWq7JC/hf0OJFc t+1WhFghDiHUuAADU0M+QTQkQaotC7CuzAtRxrrg9EoNZiYWkyIpE5BuSTEW6dk4FNbe tw2rHil6+GvhXzRsHCta/OnF8YKPJZzCbYDxk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=rF1eKoAfXW+Cyu1tl796ByLvnlaJSR11esKOUxJZw9TVgPfUVZaVSr1QpYFz8wCxrG 87LXea2R6tHGYTV0T3GuYtm6QXJX9BNmkV/CyKN09oHbxVA6GYNc8lk8kzqDLITdCy7c 6kNJIRevZ0zNX57gE/kixnJGTzLabX8iHrnBk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.115.99.29 with SMTP id b29mr1066859wam.131.1265764256783; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:10:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:10:56 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: build with vs. no ant.properties missing 5 classes? From: Myrna van Lunteren To: derbydev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I was experimenting on building trunk with the latest version of the IBM 1.6 jvm (SR7), and I noticed something odd - when I run ant all without any ant.properties file, nor any special flags, I get 5 more classes than when I set properties for j14lib, j15lib, j16lib, java14compile.classpath, java15compile.classpath, java16compile.classpath and jsr169compile.classpath. I got no errors, the 'missing' classes are all what I think are internal classes, and perhaps this build is equally ok, but I'm hoping someone has an hypothesis regarding this difference. They missing classes are: org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.authentication.LDAPAuthenticationSchemeImpl$2.class org.apache.derby.impl.services.bytecode.BCClass$1.class org.apache.derby.impl.services.bytecode.GCClass$1.class org.apache.derby.impl.store.raw.xact.TransactionTable$5.class org.apache.derby.impl.store.raw.xact.TransactionTable$6.class Thx, Myrna