Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38767 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2010 13:39:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2010 13:39:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 72358 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 13:39:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 72317 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2010 13:39:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 72223 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2010 13:39:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:39:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:39:48 +0000 Received: from brutus.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE23829A0012 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:39:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1255811663.524201267105167973.JavaMail.jira@brutus.apache.org> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:39:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Kristian Waagan (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1482) Update triggers on tables with blob columns stream blobs into memory even when the blobs are not referenced/accessed. In-Reply-To: <32561667.1152198391960.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12838342#action_12838342 ] Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-1482: ---------------------------------------- Mike wrote: ----- Kristian> The better option is probably to just write the value to the log and then read it back from the log as required. Kristian> Do you have any idea about how much effort that would take? Kristian> I'm not suggesting that it should be done now, but it would be nice to have an idea about how difficult it is. That sounds "hard" to me. I would definitely not want to see the sql layer accessing the log. The clean separation of sql layer from the store layer has greatly helped the reliablity of the product. ----- Do you feel the same about reading the value back from the table itself (instead of the log)? I've seen this approach suggested in another Jira. If feasible, is this also hard to do? > Update triggers on tables with blob columns stream blobs into memory even when the blobs are not referenced/accessed. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-1482 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1482 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Bug > Components: SQL > Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6 > Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner > Assignee: Mamta A. Satoor > Priority: Minor > Attachments: derby1482DeepCopyAfterTriggerOnLobColumn.java, derby1482Repro.java, derby1482ReproVersion2.java, TriggerTests_ver1_diff.txt, TriggerTests_ver1_stat.txt > > > Suppose I have 1) a table "t1" with blob data in it, and 2) an UPDATE trigger "tr1" defined on that table, where the triggered-SQL-action for "tr1" does NOT reference any of the blob columns in the table. [ Note that this is different from DERBY-438 because DERBY-438 deals with triggers that _do_ reference the blob column(s), whereas this issue deals with triggers that do _not_ reference the blob columns--but I think they're related, so I'm creating this as subtask to 438 ]. In such a case, if the trigger is fired, the blob data will be streamed into memory and thus consume JVM heap, even though it (the blob data) is never actually referenced/accessed by the trigger statement. > For example, suppose we have the following DDL: > create table t1 (id int, status smallint, bl blob(2G)); > create table t2 (id int, updated int default 0); > create trigger tr1 after update of status on t1 referencing new as n_row for each row mode db2sql update t2 set updated = updated + 1 where t2.id = n_row.id; > Then if t1 and t2 both have data and we make a call to: > update t1 set status = 3; > the trigger tr1 will fire, which will cause the blob column in t1 to be streamed into memory for each row affected by the trigger. The result is that, if the blob data is large, we end up using a lot of JVM memory when we really shouldn't have to (at least, in _theory_ we shouldn't have to...). > Ideally, Derby could figure out whether or not the blob column is referenced, and avoid streaming the lob into memory whenever possible (hence this is probably more of an "enhancement" request than a bug)... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.