db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Myrna van Lunteren (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (DERBY-4536) testProperties and sysinfo_withproperties test failures with ibm 1.6 on 10.3
Date Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:36:19 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Myrna van Lunteren updated DERBY-4536:

    Attachment: 904714-derbyall_diff.txt

output (derbyall_diff.txt) from nightly test run with failures.

> testProperties and sysinfo_withproperties test failures with ibm 1.6 on 10.3
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-4536
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4536
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Test
>    Affects Versions:,
>         Environment: windows XP, IBM 1.6 SR7
>            Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren
>         Attachments: 904714-derbyall_diff.txt
> In the IBM nightly test runs there's a failure in two tests with IBM 1.6, e.g. in http://people.apache.org/~myrnavl/derby_test_results/v10_3/linux/testlog/ibm16/904714-derbyall_diff.txt:
> derbyall failures *************************************************************
> derbyall/derbynetclientmats/derbynetmats.fail:derbynet/sysinfo_withproperties.java
> derbyall/derbynetclientmats/derbynetmats.fail:derbynet/testProperties.java
> I'll attach the test output in a file.
> The only difference between earlier runs is that this is with IBM 1.6 SR7 whereas before
this was run with IBM 1.6 SR6. The windows run showed no problems, but is still at IBM 1.6
> We ran into a similar situation with trunk, backported to 10.5, with the junit tests
ServerPropertiesTest and SysinfoTest. I reopened DERBY-858 and adjusted the non-deterministic
aspects of these tests.
> Apparently, the hash table ordering changed between IBM 1.6 SR6 and IBM 1.6 SR7, but
the ordering isn't guaranteed.
> I think the right thing to do here is to backport the conversions to junit of these tests,
and then backport the changes for DERBY-858. Possibly other junit framework changes also need
to get backported to support that.
> I also think the same problem will manifest for 10.4.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message