Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:03:59 -0400
From: Kim Haase <Camilla.Haase@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: Publishing the Derby documentation
In-reply-to: <4AA0FCD9.4030300@Sun.COM>
Sender: Camilla.Haase@Sun.COM
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Reply-to: Camilla.Haase@Sun.COM
Message-id: <4AA11E4F.30507@Sun.COM>
References: <4A9F94FB.60001@Sun.COM>
 <c25576af0909030912g1b674582i59246de4673c751d@mail.gmail.com>
 <4AA0FCD9.4030300@Sun.COM>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090311)

A nightly build has been lovely (thanks, Myrna!) but realistically, once 
a week would be fine for a build of the latest docs.

I wish I could volunteer for this, since I'm the one who always 
complains when the process breaks down, but I can't afford the time to 
learn about cron jobs and checksums (about which I am extremely 
ignorant). So many thanks to whoever takes this on.

Kim

On 09/04/09 07:41, Kristian Waagan wrote:
> Myrna van Lunteren wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Kristian 
>> Waagan<Kristian.Waagan@sun.com> wrote:
>>  
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have now configured a Hudson job building the Derby documentation.
>>>     
>>
>> Great!
>> Thanks for all your work on setting up the Hudson system.
>>
>> I have one question...I've a automated process that copies nightly
>> built docs out to /www/db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev. Can/Should I stop
>> that job?
>>   
> 
> Hi Myrna,
> 
> I think you can stop the job, but I would appreciate if you kept 
> everything around for a while :)
> Maybe you want to test out the new script when it's ready, or integrate 
> it in such a way that your builds work as a backup system in case Hudson 
> goes down.
> 
> The docs take a little less than 1 hour to build on the Apache server 
> we're using.
> How often do we want to check for changes and rebuild the docs?
> 
> The website also has some stuff that looks like old cruft to me:
> /www/db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.0-bak
> /www/db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.1_old
> /www/db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.4_old
> docs-10.0.tar
> docs-10.0.tar.gz
> docs-10.0.zip
> 
> Does anyone object to deleting these?
> There are also some old files lying around in dev/, so I would delete 
> that one too and "repopulate" it.
> 
> 
> Some of the directories have wrong ownership and/or wrong permissions. I 
> have taken action to fix that by sending mails to Rick, Andrew and the 
> infrastructure team.
> To allow any committer to fix issues, it is important that the 
> files/dirs have group ownership set to 'db' and that the group is given 
> write access.
> 
>