Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 26797 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2009 14:09:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2009 14:09:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 50884 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2009 14:09:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 50778 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2009 14:09:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 50753 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2009 14:09:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:09:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:09:17 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D725234C498 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 07:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <462148956.1252332537643.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 07:08:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Mark B (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-4183) Our regression tests use various jar files for which we don't have build scripts. In-Reply-To: <562511593.1240503271610.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark B updated DERBY-4183: -------------------------- Attachment: testjars.diff Hi, so it looks as though the signed jar aspect is mostly a red herring; as I would have hoped a signature won't be necessary for *every* checksum; it seems as though some of the wrong checksums are deliberate - though the checksum aspect perhaps needs documenting as I've mostly simply imported the old [often apparently wrong] checksums as manifest file entries; there is one place that a signed jar is necessary, so I've added ant script to generate the necessary key then sign; one of the jars is a database, so it really would be unwieldy uncompressed, I've made a zip of it to then compile the jar from; generally of course I would possibly need an svn branch to commit the binary changes to - alternatively I could make a tarball of the java/testing/ directory; the actual jar changes may safely be omitted, I suppose I'd svn rm the jars themselves as there is now the dynamic generation; basically for jar files that are compiled from source, I'm creating directories containing the source files, then recompiling from there; I've included the test-jar creation in the 'normal' ant build, though all the test-jar creation could be put into its own directory as an independent jar build; I'd be happy to hear your comments so far - it needs some additional testing though I seem to have managed the main hurdles Best regards Mark > Our regression tests use various jar files for which we don't have build scripts. > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-4183 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4183 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Test > Affects Versions: 10.6.0.0 > Reporter: Rick Hillegas > Attachments: testjars.diff, testjars.diff > > > We should add build scripts for these jar files. This is a mini-project suitable for a newcomer. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.