Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <2017374523.1249343234896.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Tiago R. Espinha (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-1016) javax.transaction.xa.forget (Xid)
 raises XAER_NOTA exception instead of XA_PROTO on a prepared transaction
In-Reply-To: <353482326.1140545362120.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Tiago R. Espinha updated DERBY-1016:
------------------------------------

    Attachment: DERBY-1016.patch

I'm attaching a second patch that adds a new fixture to XATransaction to test for the existence of this bug. With Ravinder's patch, the fixture passes correctly. I'll be running suites.All with both patches on.

> javax.transaction.xa.forget (Xid) raises XAER_NOTA exception instead of XA_PROTO on a prepared transaction
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1016
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1016
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.3.1, 10.2.1.6
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Assignee: Tiago R. Espinha
>         Attachments: DERBY-1016.patch, DERBY-1016_Patch_1.diff, ReproDerby1016.java, utilXid.java
>
>
> javax.transaction.xa.forget (Xid) raises XAER_NOTA exception instead of XA_PROTO on a prepared transaction
> I posted a question to derby-dev about this and heard no response so am assuming it is indeed a bug.
>  in  the  XA+ 
> specification, it seems like xa_forget should  only be valid for a
> heuristically completed transaction, so should  be  XAER_PROTO
> and not XAER_NOTA.
> In xaStateTran.sql we have this case:
> -- get back into prepared state
> xa_start xa_noflags 50;
> insert into xastate values(2);
> xa_end xa_success 50;
> xa_prepare 50;
> select * from global_xactTable where gxid is not null order by gxid;
> -- the following should error XAER_NOTA
> xa_forget 50;
> The user  code I am looking at handles forget like this. They expect 
> XAER_PROTO in this case.
>               
> try {
>              xaRes.forget(xidList[i]);
>               System.out.print("XA-Transaction [" + (i+1) + "]
> Forgotten. \n" );
> } catch (XAException XAeForget) {
>                         if ( XAeForget.errorCode ==
> XAException.XAER_PROTO ) {
>                             System.out.print("XA-Transaction [" + (i+1)
> + "] not heuristically completed yet - Rolling Back instead. \n" );
>                             xaRes.rollback(xidList[i]);
>                             System.out.print("XA-Transaction [" + (i+1)
> + "] Rolled Back. \n" );
>                         }
>                         if ( XAeForget.getMessage() != null ) {
>                             System.out.println("XAException " +
> XAeForget.getMessage() );
>              

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.