Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52540 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2009 21:38:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Aug 2009 21:38:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 55671 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 21:38:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 55603 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2009 21:38:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 55589 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2009 21:38:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:38:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:38:20 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496B0234C004 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1965454535.1251063479286.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:37:59 -0700 (PDT) From: "Dag H. Wanvik (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-4272) SQL Authorization Support for dblook In-Reply-To: <236222118.1244998687732.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12746678#action_12746678 ] Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-4272: -------------------------------------- > BTW you can get the CONNECT statements printed as regular DDL > statements (uncommented) by passing the -connectStmt argument to > dblook. Good! Does that make the SET CONNECTION statements uncommented as well? > SQL Authorization Support for dblook > ------------------------------------ > > Key: DERBY-4272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4272 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Tools > Environment: Any > Reporter: Hiranya Jayathilaka > Assignee: Hiranya Jayathilaka > Attachments: DERBY-4272-changes-u1.txt, DERBY-4272-changes-u2.txt, DERBY-4272-changes-u3.txt, DERBY-4272-changes-u4.txt, DERBY-4272-changes-u5.txt, DERBY-4272-u1.patch, DERBY-4272-u2.patch, DERBY-4272-u3.patch, DERBY-4272-u4.patch, DERBY-4272-u5.patch, dhw-sample-1.sql, new.sql, old.sql > > > Currently dblook suffers from two major shortcomings. > 1. dblook doesn't take the object dependencies into consideration when generating DDL scripts > 2. dblook doesn't have any support for SQL authorization > I intend to fix these two issues and improve dblook so that the DDL scripts generated by dblook can be executed without errors under all conditions. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.