Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <1430969098.1249923254847.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Tiago R. Espinha (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1016) javax.transaction.xa.forget (Xid)
 raises XAER_NOTA exception instead of XA_PROTO on a prepared transaction
In-Reply-To: <353482326.1140545362120.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12741421#action_12741421 ] 

Tiago R. Espinha commented on DERBY-1016:
-----------------------------------------

If I understood this properly, XA.forget does return different exceptions depending on the status of the transaction. With this in mind, we probably need to change one occurrence of the XA.forget in the harness test to accommodate for the fact that the exception being thrown for this specific case is now different.

Is this correct?

> javax.transaction.xa.forget (Xid) raises XAER_NOTA exception instead of XA_PROTO on a prepared transaction
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1016
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1016
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.3.1, 10.2.1.6
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Assignee: Tiago R. Espinha
>         Attachments: DERBY-1016.patch, DERBY-1016.patch, DERBY-1016_Patch_1.diff, ReproDerby1016.java, utilXid.java
>
>
> javax.transaction.xa.forget (Xid) raises XAER_NOTA exception instead of XA_PROTO on a prepared transaction
> I posted a question to derby-dev about this and heard no response so am assuming it is indeed a bug.
>  in  the  XA+ 
> specification, it seems like xa_forget should  only be valid for a
> heuristically completed transaction, so should  be  XAER_PROTO
> and not XAER_NOTA.
> In xaStateTran.sql we have this case:
> -- get back into prepared state
> xa_start xa_noflags 50;
> insert into xastate values(2);
> xa_end xa_success 50;
> xa_prepare 50;
> select * from global_xactTable where gxid is not null order by gxid;
> -- the following should error XAER_NOTA
> xa_forget 50;
> The user  code I am looking at handles forget like this. They expect 
> XAER_PROTO in this case.
>               
> try {
>              xaRes.forget(xidList[i]);
>               System.out.print("XA-Transaction [" + (i+1) + "]
> Forgotten. \n" );
> } catch (XAException XAeForget) {
>                         if ( XAeForget.errorCode ==
> XAException.XAER_PROTO ) {
>                             System.out.print("XA-Transaction [" + (i+1)
> + "] not heuristically completed yet - Rolling Back instead. \n" );
>                             xaRes.rollback(xidList[i]);
>                             System.out.print("XA-Transaction [" + (i+1)
> + "] Rolled Back. \n" );
>                         }
>                         if ( XAeForget.getMessage() != null ) {
>                             System.out.println("XAException " +
> XAeForget.getMessage() );
>              

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.