From derby-dev-return-71962-apmail-db-derby-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org Thu Aug 06 21:03:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87783 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2009 21:03:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2009 21:03:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 21035 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2009 21:03:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 20962 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2009 21:03:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 20950 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2009 21:03:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:03:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of tiago@espinhas.net does not designate 209.85.219.207 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.207] (HELO mail-ew0-f207.google.com) (209.85.219.207) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:03:25 +0000 Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so10497ewy.7 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:03:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.62.12 with SMTP id k12mr417961eba.19.1249592583196; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:03:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A7B4370.1090403@bristowhill.com> References: <4A75C5FD.6060902@sbcglobal.net> <4A7863E8.7000408@sbcglobal.net> <4A786A5A.2060303@sun.com> <196099.16312.qm@web65716.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4A7B0B79.80409@sbcglobal.net> <4A7B3254.1090300@bristowhill.com> <4A7B3858.4090303@sbcglobal.net> <4A7B4370.1090403@bristowhill.com> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 22:03:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DERBY-4331 and the 10.5.2.0 release From: Tiago Espinha To: derby-dev@db.apache.org, jta@bristowhill.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174bf1fe0910f704707f72da X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174bf1fe0910f704707f72da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Considering we aren't aware of how many people actually downloaded 10.5.2.0, then it might be wise to e-mail the user list and post a big warning with the 10.5.[2.1|3.0] release urging 10.5.2.0 users to upgrade to the new version asap. Tiago On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote: > Kathey Marsden wrote: > >> Jean T. Anderson wrote: >> >>> The release happened, but there's no reason you can't quickly follow up >>> with another release with bug fixes. >>> >>> Thanks Jean for the clarification that the release really did happen. I >> honestly wasn't sure it had. :-) I think since a release happened, I feel >> more strongly that we should keep release notes separate, not merge Jira >> versions, etc. >> >> Kathey >> >> I just downloaded it -- it's already out on mirrors worldwide. :-) The > release happened, and was approved by the DB PMC. > > Now, given that it has been available for a week, if it's so broken that > folks shouldn't use it, it might be wise to remove it, maybe update the > website to indicate that those who have already downloaded should be aware > of the two key bugs that are (or will be) included in 10.5.2.1. > > -jean > > --0015174bf1fe0910f704707f72da Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Considering we aren't aware of how many people actually downloaded 10.5= .2.0, then it might be wise to e-mail the user list and post a big warning = with the 10.5.[2.1|3.0] release urging 10.5.2.0 users to upgrade to the new= version asap.

Tiago

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 = at 9:56 PM, Jean T. Anderson <jta@bristowhill.com> wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
The release happened, =A0but there's no reason you can't quickly fo= llow up with another release with bug fixes.

Thanks Jean for the clarification that the release really did happen. I hon= estly wasn't sure it had. =A0:-) I think since a release happened, I fe= el more strongly =A0that we should keep release notes separate, not merge J= ira versions, etc.

Kathey

I just downloaded it -- it's already out on mirrors worldwide. :-) The = release happened, and was approved by the DB PMC.

Now, given that it has been available for a week, if it's so broken tha= t folks shouldn't use it, it might be wise to remove it, maybe update t= he website to indicate that those who have already downloaded should be awa= re of the two key bugs that are (or will be) included in 10.5.2.1.

-jean


--0015174bf1fe0910f704707f72da--