From derby-dev-return-71959-apmail-db-derby-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org Thu Aug 06 20:55:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85832 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2009 20:55:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 2009 20:55:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 10674 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2009 20:55:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 10604 invoked by uid 500); 6 Aug 2009 20:55:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 10596 invoked by uid 99); 6 Aug 2009 20:55:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:55:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.43.132] (HELO sca-es-mail-1.sun.com) (192.18.43.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:55:13 +0000 Received: from fe-sfbay-09.sun.com ([192.18.43.129]) by sca-es-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n76Kse6x017748 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:54:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-sfbay-09.sun.com by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) id <0KNZ00900326NF00@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from richard-hillegas-computer.local ([unknown] [67.169.70.114]) by fe-sfbay-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 64bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0KNZ002JI3EUL050@fe-sfbay-09.sun.com> for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:54:31 -0700 From: Rick Hillegas Subject: Re: DERBY-4331 and the 10.5.2.0 release In-reply-to: <4A7B3858.4090303@sbcglobal.net> Sender: Richard.Hillegas@Sun.COM To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Message-id: <4A7B4307.9090109@sun.com> References: <4A75C5FD.6060902@sbcglobal.net> <4A7721A0.5020207@sbcglobal.net> <4A7863E8.7000408@sbcglobal.net> <4A786A5A.2060303@sun.com> <196099.16312.qm@web65716.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <4A7B0B79.80409@sbcglobal.net> <4A7B3254.1090300@bristowhill.com> <4A7B3858.4090303@sbcglobal.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Kathey Marsden wrote: > Jean T. Anderson wrote: >> The release happened, but there's no reason you can't quickly follow >> up with another release with bug fixes. >> > Thanks Jean for the clarification that the release really did happen. > I honestly wasn't sure it had. :-) I think since a release happened, > I feel more strongly that we should keep release notes separate, not > merge Jira versions, etc. > > Kathey > I don't really care what we call it. There is no reason that the release notes have to describe the delta between the current release and the immediately preceding one. I can build a 10.5.3.0 whose release notes describes its delta from 10.5.1.1.