db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lily Wei (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (DERBY-4166) improvements to the mailjdbc test
Date Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:14:14 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Lily Wei updated DERBY-4166:

    Attachment: DERBY-4166-schemachange4.diff

I was hoping rollback will take care of the deadlock problem. However, with rollback, close
connection and reopen connection, the mailjdbc embedded test still has deadlock error after
16 hours. I fix some Rn.nextInt issue for attach_id on line 200 for DbTasks.java. for DERBY-4166-schemachange4.diff.
When insert is taking longer than 10 seconds, the tests will run into the situation of deadlock.
I think we are very close too. I am still thinking doing more on mailjdbc side to avoid deadlock
situation.  Interrupt Refresh thread still happens, InsertMail method did not fail.

> improvements to the mailjdbc test
> ---------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-4166
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4166
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Test
>    Affects Versions:
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: DERBY-4166-databasesize.diff, Derby-4166-samedb.diff, DERBY-4166-schemachange.diff,
DERBY-4166-schemachange2.diff, DERBY-4166-schemachange3.diff, DERBY-4166-schemachange4.diff,
> When recently working with the mailjdbc system test org.apache.derbyTesting.system.mailjdbc
on DERBY-4152 I noticed some potential improvements that might be good for the test.  We should
probably hold off on these improvements however until the root cause of DERBY-4152 is established,
however, so we don't muddy the waters with that issue by changing the test.
> 1) DbTasks.moveToFolders may throw an IllegalArgumentException.
>   There is a line:  message_id = Rn.nextInt(count - 1);
>   if count is 1 the argument to nextInt() might be 0 which is not allowed.  I hit this
once but lost the stack trace, but it is apparent that when there is only one row in the table
this can occur.
> 2) Allow/implement multiple attachments per message and cleanup DbTasks.insertMail()
>    - Remove the attach_id column from INBOX to allow multiple attachments.
>    -Make the attachment insert part of the message for loop in insertMail.
>    Use getGeneratedKeys() to get the id of the inserted message.
>    When attachments are inserted, insert (1-4) attachments and give them a corresponding
attach_id from 1-4.
> This will allow for removal of the select statements used to determine id and attach_id.
 I'll file another issue for these improvements if folks agree that they are sensible.
> A detailed description of the current implementation of insertMail is described at https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12405685/insertMailSummary.txt
> 3) DbTasks.databaseSize calculation is wrong. It doesn't match du -sk. The method does
not recurse into subdirectories and includes the length() on directory files which is undefined
accourding to the file.length() javadoc.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message