db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lily Wei (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (DERBY-2504) SQL warning "01501: The view V21VIEWTEST has been dropped" can be lost (ie. not seen when it should be)
Date Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:58:14 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2504?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Lily Wei updated DERBY-2504:

    Attachment: repro.zipx

I am adding getLastActivation on ViewDescriptor.makeInvalide for the case of DependencyManager.INTERNAL_RECOMPILE_REQUEST
because it helps to cases like repro2.sql. If the privilege was granted and being revoked,
revoke it again will fall to case of INTERNAL_RECOMPILE_REQUEST. In that case, the dependency
object is still being removed. I think users should get warning for that. However, Dan's point
is still true, getLastActivation() has no guarantee of the current executing statement at
runtime as repro3.sql demonstrate. I am posting this try fix because I don't understand what
is doing on in repro3.sql. When break at 'execute R1', I got the case of DependencyManager.INTERNAL_RECOMPILE_REQUEST,
I step in to 
            this.getObjectName() ));
However, the debugger just jump in the the default case and stop at SanityManager.THROWASSERT("did
not expect to get called");

          I believe in repro3.sql case, it should raise a warning. If there is no ActivationObject,
I can code it as try and catch. Also, if default case is really being executed, why did not
print to derby.log. What am I missing?

> SQL warning "01501: The view V21VIEWTEST has been dropped"  can be lost (ie. not seen
when it should be)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-2504
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2504
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions:,,
>            Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: Derby-2504.diff, repro.zipx
> Example, grantRevokeDDL test has this SQL and correct output:
> revoke select on t11ViewTest from public;
> 0 rows inserted/updated/deleted
> WARNING 01501: The view V21VIEWTEST has been dropped.
> But if instead the statement is prepared and another statement prepared before the execution
then the warning will not appear
> prepare R1 as 'revoke select on t11ViewTest from public';
> ij(MAMTA1)> prepare V1 as 'values 1';
> ij(MAMTA1)> execute R1;
> 0 rows inserted/updated/deleted
> ij(MAMTA1)> execute V1;
> 1          
> -----------
> 1          
> 1 row selected
> If I don't prepare V1 then the exception is seen, so it's not the prepare causing the

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message