db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Hillegas <Richard.Hille...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Jira field definitions
Date Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:39:31 GMT
Kathey Marsden wrote:
> Rick Hillegas wrote:
>>
>> Once you have specified what to do with the lingering questions in 
>> (2), I think that you will have a well-defined proposal for a 
>> community vote. I regard this as a procedural issue so I think that 
>> the rules of engagement would be majority vote by PMC members: 
>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>
>> This looks like a good step in the right direction. Once the vote 
>> closes and the form is changed, I look forward to helping triage the 
>> open bugs.
>>
> I don't know that a vote is really necessary as  I am sure the process 
> will continue to evolve as we determine how we will conduct the triage 
> and start using the updated procedures.   If we do need a vote, we 
> probably should discuss how we want to conduct the triage first as it 
> might impact the fields we need.
>
> Kathey
>
>
This is what I intend to do during the triage:

1) Sanity check the Issue Type field.

2) Sanity check and mark all applicable check boxes.

Those fields plus the user votes will give me the information I need to 
guide my bug fixing.

Thanks,
-Rick

Mime
View raw message