Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95475 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2009 23:30:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2009 23:30:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 7147 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2009 23:30:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 7084 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2009 23:30:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 7076 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2009 23:30:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:30:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:30:51 +0000 Received: from brutus (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brutus.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE63234C04C for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1477854627.1241047831129.JavaMail.jira@brutus> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:30:31 -0700 (PDT) From: "Kathey Marsden (JIRA)" To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-4181) SQLState.LANG_IGNORE_MISSING_INDEX_ROW_DURING_DELETE during NsTest run In-Reply-To: <236156022.1240438487720.JavaMail.jira@brutus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704405#action_12704405 ] Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-4181: --------------------------------------- This is what I discovered today regarding this issue: It always seems to happen on record 36XXX even with no jit run. It just took 45 minutes to get there. Reproduces with embedded. You can run with embedded by passing the "Embedded" argument to the test. Reproduces without backup. You can run with -Dderby.nstest.backupRestore=false Reproduces without encryption. Reproduces without Tester3 threads (was just doing selects) and without Tester2 threads (doing the same operation as Tester1 but getting a new connection each time.) Reproduces without updates (just inserts and deletes) Reproduces with just one Tester1 thread, doing sequential insert and delete operations. Trying now with just one INIT thread (was 6) and it has been running for 10 minutes. So I am guessing the corruption is occurring with the mulithreaded insert used to set up the test, but we don't see it until later when we try a delete. If this runs ok for a while I will go back to multithreaded and put a consistency check in after the inserts complete to verify this theory. > SQLState.LANG_IGNORE_MISSING_INDEX_ROW_DURING_DELETE during NsTest run > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-4181 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4181 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Store > Affects Versions: 10.4.2.0, 10.5.1.0, 10.5.1.1, 10.6.0.0 > Environment: Suse Linux 10, IBM 1.6 SR4 > Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren > Attachments: log_excerpt_sample_assert.txt, run1serverlog.jar, serverlog.jar > > > During the NsTest runs for 10.5.1.0 and 10.5.1.1 I initially ignored warnings showing up in the server's derby.log file: > WARNING: While deleting a row from a table the index row for base table row (594,12) was not found in index with conglomerate id 1,185. This problem has automatically been corrected as part of the delete operation. > However, I don't think this is a completely healthy warning, I think it indicates there was corruption in the index. > I'll investigate further. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.