db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Knut Anders Hatlen <Knut.Hat...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Preliminary results from testing the 10.5.1.0 RC
Date Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:47:58 GMT
Ole Solberg <Ole.Solberg@Sun.COM> writes:

> On 04/03/09 14:27, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
>> Ole Solberg <Ole.Solberg@Sun.COM> writes:
>>
>>> The following failures were seen:
>>
>> Thanks for the report, Ole. I have one question, please see below.
>>
>>> DERBY-2478 (CLOSED!?)
>>
>> Do you have the stack trace for this error? The report seems to have
>> been truncated:
>> http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/10.5.1.0_RC/jvm1.6-64/testing/testlog/sparc/757599-suitesAll_diff.txt
>>
>
> This happened in derbyall, see:
> http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/10.5.1.0_RC/jvm1.6-64/testing/testlog/sparc/757599-derbyall_diff.txt
>
> but the first diff is
>
> ********* Diff file
> derbyall/derbynetmats/DerbyNet/derbynetmats/holdCursorIJ.diff
> *** Start: holdCursorIJ jdk1.6.0_06 DerbyNet derbynetmats:derbynetmats
> 2009-04-02 23:25:38 ***
> 115 del
> < ERROR X0X95: Operation 'DROP TABLE' cannot be performed on object
> T1' because there is an open ResultSet dependent on that object.
> 115a115
>> ERROR X0X95: DB2 SQL error: SQLCODE: -1, SQLSTATE: X0X95, 
> SQLERRMC: DROP TABLET1X0X95.S
> 116a117
>> ERROR 58009: Execution failed due to a distribution protocol error 
> that caused deallocation of the conversation.  The requested command
> encountered an unarchitected and implementation specific condition for
> which there was no architected message.
> 120 del
> < ERROR X0X95: Operation 'DROP TABLE' cannot be performed on object
> T1' because there is an open ResultSet dependent on that object.
>
>
> so my automatic matching probably fooled me here...

OK. But still, the link I posted above shows a failure in suites.All,
but it doesn't say which test. Is that log from an aborted test run?

-- 
Knut Anders

Mime
View raw message