db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-4084) Determine the subSubProtocol name for the in-memory back end
Date Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:06:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12680598#action_12680598
] 

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-4084:
-------------------------------------------

My vote goes to "memory" because 

1) It's sufficiently easy to type (short and no special characters)
2) It's consistent with the other sub-protocols (they're not named "in-jar" or "in-classpath")
3) It's sufficiently descriptive (I feel that the proper place to describe this feature is
in the documentation, not in the URL ;)

But I'm fine with any of the alternatives suggested so far.

> Determine the subSubProtocol name for the in-memory back end
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4084
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4084
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 10.5.0.0
>            Reporter: Kristian Waagan
>
> The community should agree on a name for the subSubProtocol for the in-memory back end.
The name will be used in the connection URL, and it is the mechanism used to tell Derby to
use the in-memory back end:
> jdbc:derby:subSubProtocol:dbName
> Two hot candidates are:
>  o mem
>  o memory
> The former is shorter, the latter is slightly more descriptive. If you have opinions
on this, please post a comment.
> We should decide on this before we cut the branch for 10.5.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message