Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29500 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2009 12:58:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2009 12:58:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 33820 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2009 12:58:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 33620 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2009 12:58:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 33611 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2009 12:58:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:58:39 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.18.6.24] (HELO gmp-eb-inf-2.sun.com) (192.18.6.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:58:31 +0000 Received: from fe-emea-09.sun.com (gmp-eb-lb-1-fe3.eu.sun.com [192.18.6.10]) by gmp-eb-inf-2.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id n1RCvrD1024938 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:58:09 GMT MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from conversion-daemon.fe-emea-09.sun.com by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 23 2008)) id <0KFQ00J006MN8400@fe-emea-09.sun.com> for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:57:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([unknown] [129.159.112.134]) by fe-emea-09.sun.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.0-3.01 64bit (built Dec 23 2008)) with ESMTPSA id <0KFQ00KCJ6O4SG50@fe-emea-09.sun.com> for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:57:40 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:57:39 +0100 From: Knut Anders Hatlen Subject: Re: DERBY-2487 for 10.5? In-reply-to: <49A5DD1C.6030402@amberpoint.com> Sender: Knut.Hatlen@Sun.COM To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Message-id: Organization: Sun Microsystems References: <49A5DD1C.6030402@amberpoint.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.90 (usg-unix-v) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Bryan Pendleton writes: > I'm interested in pursuing whether DERBY-2487 could be completed > in time for the Derby 10.5 release. The current draft schedule > on the Wiki suggests a branch creation date of March 16, which > doesn't leave a huge amount of time. > > However, I think that the DERBY-2487 patch is in pretty good shape, > so I think it's reasonable to consider this as a candidate for the > release. > > What does the community think? Would this be too aggressive? Are > there particular issues with the patch which people feel are blockers > at this point? Is anybody interested in reviewing the patch in > greater detail prior to commit? What risks do people see in including > this patch in 10.5? > > Please understand, I'm not proposing to commit the patch now; I'm > anticipating a fair amount more work on the patch prior to commit. > But I do think it's quite possible it could be ready in time for > the 10.5 release, and I'd like to make that happen if possible. Hi Bryan, It looks like the patch is almost exclusively adding new code, and barely changes any existing code paths, so the risk of breaking existing functionality is not that big. So if you think that it's not very likely that we'll have to change the API when we get more experience with it (which can be difficult if users have started depending on it), I'd say that you should go for it. -- Knut Anders