db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kristian Waagan (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Updated: (DERBY-4004) Remove required RDBNAM from ACCSEC. Use SECCHK RDBNAM if none is provided on ACCSEC
Date Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:44:59 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

Kristian Waagan updated DERBY-4004:

    Attachment: derby-4004-fix_new_protcoltest.diff

The patch 'derby-4004-fix_new_protcoltest.diff' makes the new protocol test run successfully
with the new tests added.
Before the change it ran 150 tests, after Katheys patch it runs 151 (two added, one removed).

Changes in "protocol.tests" are picked up automatically, but if new files are added java/testing/org/apache/derby/impl/drda/ProtocolTest.java
must be updated.
This test still has the problem that it cannot be run as part of suites.All, but it can be
run with 'ant junit-pptesting'.
Note that the old version of the test is still being run as part of a suite.

>  Remove required RDBNAM from ACCSEC. Use SECCHK RDBNAM if none is provided on ACCSEC
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: DERBY-4004
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4004
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Network Client, Network Server
>    Affects Versions:
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Assignee: Kathey Marsden
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: derby-4004-fix_new_protcoltest.diff, derby-4004_diff.txt
> Currently Derby requires RDBNAM on ACCSEC. The DDM spec lists it as optional. For DERBY-728,
in order to negotiate the encoding, EXCSAT and ACCSEC will need to remain EBCDIC, so we want
the RDBNAM to be optional.  We can use the RDBNAM sent in SECCHK instead.
> Once this is done. Client can be changed to only send RDBNAM on ACCSEC if an EBCDIC conversion
is possible.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message