Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-ID: <1272024599.1229968964383.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:02:44 -0800 (PST)
From: "Dag H. Wanvik (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-481) implement SQL generated columns
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658604#action_12658604 ] 

Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-481:
-------------------------------------

A possible answer may be that a column level constraints is defined as *equivalent* to
table level constraints in section 11.4 SR 12. Since this is a syntactic rule, I guess we could
argue that the standard sees column level constraints as a syntactic variation of a table level constraint,
in which case the RESTRICT behavior discussed above would apply to it as well. What do you think?


> implement SQL generated columns
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-481
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-481
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.0.2.1
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>            Assignee: Rick Hillegas
>         Attachments: derby-481-00-aa-prototype.diff, derby-481-01-aa-catalog.diff, derby-481-02-aa-utilities.diff, derby-481-03-aa-grammar.diff, derby-481-04-aa-insert.diff, derby-481-05-aa-update.diff, derby-481-06-aa-genreferences.diff, derby-481-07-aa-noSQLinRoutines.diff, derby-481-07-ab-noSQLinRoutines.diff, derby-481-08-aa-castToDeclaredType.diff, derby-481-09-aa-dummyDefaults.diff, derby-481-10-aa-foreignKeyActions.diff, derby-481-11-aa-notNull.diff, derby-481-12-aa-padding.diff, derby-481-13-aa-alterDatatype.diff, derby-481-14-ab-dropColumn.diff, derby-481-15-aa-renameAndAddDefault.diff, derby-481-16-aa-dropFunction.diff, derby-481-17-aa-currentSchema.diff, derby-481-18-aa-updatableResultSets.diff, derby-481-19-aa-cleanup.diff, derby-481-20-aa-cleanup.diff, GeneratedColumns.html, GeneratedColumns.html, GeneratedColumns.html
>
>
> Satheesh has pointed out that generated columns, a SQL 2003 feature, would satisfy the performance requirements of Expression Indexes (bug 455). Generated columns may not be as elegant as Expression Indexes, but they are easier to implement. We would allow the following new kind of column definition in CREATE TABLE and ALTER TABLE statements:
>     columnName GENERATED ALWAYS AS ( expression )
> If expression were an indexableExpression (as defined in bug 455), then we could create indexes on it. There is no work for the optimizer to do here. The Language merely has to compute the generated column at INSERT/UPDATE time.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.